World Population, GDP per Capita, Fertility and Poverty to 2100 – PPBF artikel over financiële data science voor MKB
Research

World Population, GDP per Capita, Fertility and Poverty to 2100

11 May 2026
15 min
Terug naar blog

Author: PPBF / Manus AI  |  Date: May 11, 2026  |  Scope: Global population to 2100, GDP per capita by country, fertility trends, and global poverty.

Executive Summary

The global population is expected to keep growing for several decades, but the pace of growth is slowing markedly. Based on UN World Population Prospects 2024, the world population is estimated at roughly 8.16 billion in 2024, 9.66 billion in 2050, a peak of about 10.29 billion around 2084, and then a slight decline to roughly 10.18 billion in 2100. The core message is not that humanity suddenly stops growing, but that global fertility is structurally declining. Total fertility fell from about 4.7 children per woman in 1960 to 2.25 in 2023, and is projected at approximately 2.10 in 2050 and 1.84 in 2100.

The distribution of growth is at least as important as the global total. Africa grows from approximately 1.51 billion people in 2024 to 3.81 billion in 2100, while Asia peaks around mid-century and then declines. Europe shrinks in absolute terms, and Latin America also reaches a peak followed by decline.

Economic development is strongly associated with declining fertility. The correlation between log10(PPP GDP per capita) and fertility is approximately -0.82. For poverty, the picture is nuanced: in the OWID/World Bank series using the $3 per day line, the share fell from about 43.4% in 1990 to 10.6% in 2023 and a nowcast of 10.0% in 2026. The World Bank warns that under current trends 622 million people would still be extremely poor in 2030.

Data Sources and Method

This study primarily uses authoritative international datasets. For population and fertility, it uses UN World Population Prospects 2024, accessed through Our World in Data. For GDP per capita, the World Bank indicators NY.GDP.PCAP.CD (nominal) and NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD (PPP) were used. The IMF DataMapper from the World Economic Outlook April 2026 was used as an additional benchmark.

Definition. Nominal GDP per capita measures the monetary value of production per person at market exchange rates and current prices. PPP GDP per capita corrects for differences in local price levels and is therefore generally more suitable for comparing living standards across countries.

1. Expected Development of the World Population to 2100

The UN projection shows a clear transition from rapid expansion toward stabilisation. Between 2024 and 2050, the population still grows by roughly 1.50 billion people, but between 2050 and the peak in 2084 it grows by only about 0.62 billion. After that, growth turns negative. This pattern is typical of the final stage of the global demographic transition.

World population projection to 2100 according to UN WPP 2024, showing peak at 10.29 billion in 2084
World population according to UN WPP 2024, medium projection — peak at 10.29 billion around 2084. Source: UN World Population Prospects 2024 / Our World in Data.
YearWorld PopulationInterpretation
20248.16 billionCurrent baseline in UN WPP 2024.
20308.57 billionGrowth continues, but at a slower pace.
20509.66 billionA large part of the remaining growth has already occurred.
208410.29 billionEstimated peak in the medium variant.
210010.18 billionSlight decline after the peak.

The regional decomposition shows that the global projection is mainly a story of African growth versus Asian stabilisation and later decline. Africa grows by approximately 2.30 billion people between 2024 and 2100. Asia remains the largest region in absolute terms, but declines from about 4.81 billion in 2024 to 4.61 billion in 2100 after a peak around mid-century.

Population projections by world region to 2100 — Africa grows to 3.81 billion while Asia peaks and declines
Population projections by world region (UN WPP 2024). Africa is the only region with sustained growth throughout the century. Source: UN World Population Prospects 2024.
Region202420502100Change 2024–2100
Africa1.51 bn2.47 bn3.81 bn+2.30 bn
Asia4.81 bn5.28 bn4.61 bn-0.19 bn
Europe0.75 bn0.70 bn0.59 bn-0.15 bn
Latin America & Caribbean0.66 bn0.73 bn0.61 bn-0.05 bn
Northern America0.39 bn0.43 bn0.47 bn+0.09 bn
Oceania0.05 bn0.06 bn0.07 bn+0.03 bn

2. Fertility and the Demographic Transition

The key demographic variable behind the slowdown is the total fertility rate. The world as a whole is approaching the replacement level of approximately 2.1 children per woman and is projected to move below it thereafter. High-income countries have often been below replacement level for a long time; middle-income countries such as China, Brazil, Mexico and Thailand also have low or declining fertility; low-income countries, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa, remain higher on average but also show a downward trend.

Declining global fertility rate from 4.7 in 1960 to projected 1.84 in 2100, with regional breakdown
Declining fertility: children per woman — global average crosses replacement level (~2.1) around 2025 and continues declining. Source: UN WPP 2024 / Our World in Data.
YearGlobal Fertility (children/woman)Meaning
19604.70High-growth regime of the post-war period.
20232.25Close to replacement level, but with large regional differences.
20502.10Around the global replacement level.
21001.84Global average below replacement level.

The relationship with economic development is visible in the country comparison. Lower income levels are generally associated with higher fertility, while high-income countries are almost everywhere below replacement level. The correlation in the country-level data used here is strongly negative (r = -0.82), but the interpretation must remain structural: income operates through education, health, urban labour markets, female labour-force participation, child mortality, pension expectations and access to reproductive healthcare.

Scatter plot showing strong negative correlation (-0.82) between PPP GDP per capita and fertility rate by country
Economic development level and fertility — correlation log10(PPP GDP/capita) vs TFR: -0.82. Bubble size = population. Source: World Bank / UN WPP 2024.
Income GroupCountriesMedian PPP GDP/capitaMedian FertilityTotal Population
Low income25$2,2024.120.62 bn
Lower middle income50$7,4272.893.12 bn
Upper middle income54$21,2131.762.82 bn
High income86$57,6251.451.39 bn

3. GDP per Capita by Country: Nominal versus PPP

GDP per capita differs substantially depending on the measure used. Nominal GDP per capita is especially sensitive to exchange rates and is relevant for international financial purchasing power. PPP GDP per capita corrects for local prices and usually provides a more realistic picture of domestic living standards. PPP values are therefore much higher than nominal values in many lower- and middle-income countries.

The IMF DataMapper reports a 2026 world average of about $15.68 thousand nominal GDP per capita and $27.65 thousand PPP GDP per capita. For advanced economies, the IMF gives approximately $66.18 thousand nominal and $77.84 thousand PPP; for emerging and developing economies approximately $7.56 thousand nominal and $19.59 thousand PPP.

Comparison of nominal vs PPP GDP per capita in the 20 largest countries — large gap visible for India, China, Russia
Nominal vs PPP GDP per capita in the 20 largest countries. The gap is largest for India, Nigeria, Bangladesh and Russia. Source: World Bank 2024.
CountryPopulationNominal GDP/capitaPPP GDP/capitaFertility
India1,450.9 M$2,695$11,1601.96
China1,409.0 M$13,303$27,1051.01
United States340.1 M$84,534$85,8101.63
Indonesia283.5 M$4,925$16,4482.12
Pakistan251.3 M$1,479$6,2523.55
Nigeria232.7 M$1,084$9,0874.38
Brazil212.0 M$10,311$22,3381.61
Russian Federation143.5 M$14,889$47,4051.42
Japan124.0 M$32,487$52,0391.15
Mexico130.9 M$14,186$26,1851.89

4. Is Poverty Increasing or Decreasing?

Over the long term, the conclusion is clear: poverty has declined sharply as a share of the world population. In the $3/day series, the share falls from 43.4% in 1990 to 10.6% in 2023 and 10.0% in 2026. The absolute number of people below this line also fell strongly, from approximately 2.31 billion in 1990 to approximately 828 million in 2026.

Global extreme poverty trend 1990-2026: share below $3/day fell from 43.4% to 10.0%, absolute numbers from 2.3 billion to 828 million
Global extreme poverty according to OWID/World Bank ($3 per day). Both the share and absolute number have declined sharply since 1990. Source: Our World in Data / World Bank.
YearShare below $3/dayPeople below $3/day
199043.4%2,313 million
200036.4%2,229 million
201021.0%1,473 million
201910.8%841 million
202310.6%859 million
202610.0%828 million

The World Bank warns, however, that the current trend is insufficient for the international poverty target. In the Poverty, Prosperity and Planet Report 2024, the World Bank states that nearly 700 million people, or 8.5% of the world population, live below the older $2.15 line, while about 3.5 billion people, or 44%, live below the $6.85 line. Under the trend at the time, 622 million people would still live in extreme poverty in 2030.

5. Combined Interpretation: Economy, Births and Poverty

The question of whether economic growth moderates population growth can be answered affirmatively, but with nuance. A growing economy does not automatically reduce births, but economic development typically activates several mechanisms that lower fertility. Once child mortality falls, education rises and women gain access to labour markets and reproductive healthcare, both desired and realised family size tend to fall.

Income level, GDP per capita and fertility: high income countries have median fertility of 1.45, low income countries 4.12
Income level, GDP per capita and fertility — as income rises, fertility declines sharply. The dashed red line marks replacement level (2.1). Source: World Bank / UN WPP 2024.

The country comparison shows that high-income countries have very low fertility on average. Over time this creates new economic challenges: population ageing, tight labour markets, higher healthcare and pension burdens, and possibly lower potential growth. For low-income countries, the challenge is different: they need to reach the demographic-dividend phase through education, healthcare, employment and productivity growth before rapid population growth overwhelms public services.

Poverty is therefore linked to both dimensions. High fertility in very poor countries can make it harder for income per capita to rise because education, healthcare and infrastructure must be spread across more children. The crucial variable is not population growth by itself, but productivity growth per person, the quality of institutions and the degree to which growth is inclusive.

6. Scenarios and Uncertainties to 2100

Projections to 2100 are not forecasts in the strict sense, but conditional estimates. The largest uncertainties concern fertility, migration, mortality, climate impacts, conflicts, pandemics, technological change and the distribution of economic growth.

UncertaintyEffect on PopulationEffect on GDP/capitaEffect on Poverty
Faster fertility decline in AfricaLower global peak, faster stabilisationPotentially higher income/capita if education and jobs growCan reduce poverty faster under inclusive policy
Slow fertility decline in low-income countriesHigher population in 2100Pressure on education, infrastructure and labour marketsRisk of persistent absolute poverty
Rapid productivity growth in poor countriesDemography changes indirectly through higher incomesStrong convergence in PPP GDP/capitaLarge poverty reduction possible
Conflict and climate stressMigration, higher mortality, lower investmentLower growth and capital destructionPoverty can rise locally or regionally
Ageing in rich countries and ChinaSmaller working-age populationPressure on growth unless productivity risesLess direct extreme poverty, but more fiscal pressure

Conclusion

The world is moving toward a demographic peak in the final quarter of the twenty-first century. The most likely development according to the UN medium variant is continued growth to about 10.3 billion around 2084, followed by slight decline toward 2100. This development is mainly driven by declining births as economic and social development advances.

GDP per capita remains highly unequal. Nominal rankings emphasise financial centres and exchange-rate effects; PPP rankings are better for living standards. For the largest countries, PPP is often much higher than the nominal value, especially in large middle-income countries such as India, Indonesia, Nigeria and Bangladesh.

Poverty has declined sharply historically and is more likely to continue falling as a share of the world population than to rise. Nevertheless, the pace is insufficient to meet international targets. The central conclusion is therefore: the world is becoming demographically older and economically richer on average, but whether poverty falls substantially further depends on productivity growth, stability, education, health and inclusive institutions in the poorest and fastest-growing countries.

References

  1. United Nations, World Population Prospects 2024.
  2. Our World in Data, Fertility rate with projections.
  3. World Bank, GDP per capita (current US$).
  4. World Bank, GDP per capita, PPP.
  5. IMF, World Economic Outlook April 2026 DataMapper.
  6. World Bank, Poverty, Prosperity and Planet Report 2024.
  7. Our World in Data, Share of population in extreme poverty.

Klaar voor een gratis Finance Scan?

Laat ons analyseren hoe we uw financiële organisatie kunnen transformeren.

Plan een Gratis Finance Scan